H231 AUSTRALIAN CINEMA
ASSIGNMENT
TWO
PART 1
JO
TOYNE
Director: Samantha
Lang
Scriptwriter: Anne Kennedy
Cinematographer: Garry
Philips
Producers: Robert
Connolly, John Maynard
Production
Company: Arena Film
Lead
Actors: Susie Porter plays Jill Fitzpatrick
Kelly McGillis plays Diana
Marton Csokas plays Nick
Deborah Mailman plays Lou
Abbie Cornish plays Mickey
Release Dates for Australia: Theatrical release: 10 May 2001
Video
release: 9
January, 2002
DVD
release: 15
March 2001
Released
in the US: 27
July 2001
Box
Office Figures
Total
US gross: $49,
007
|
Weekend Chart Record |
|
|||||||
|
Date |
Rank |
|
Gross |
% Change |
Theaters |
Per Theater |
Total Gross |
Days |
|
99 |
|
$3,942 |
|
1 |
$3,942 |
$3,942 |
3 |
|
|
90 |
|
$3,015 |
-23.52% |
1 |
$3,015 |
$9,616 |
10 |
|
|
106 |
|
$1,379 |
-54.26% |
1 |
$1,379 |
$12,555 |
17 |
|
|
105 |
|
$553 |
-59.90% |
1 |
$553 |
$13,833 |
24 |
|
|
86 |
|
$6,621 |
+1,097.29% |
2 |
$3,311 |
$20,859 |
31 |
|
|
89 |
|
$7,436 |
|
3 |
$2,479 |
$32,899 |
45 |
|
|
115 |
|
$753 |
-89.87% |
2 |
$377 |
$36,714 |
52 |
|
|
112 |
|
$2,044 |
|
2 |
$1,022 |
$39,155 |
66 |
|
|
119 |
|
$397 |
-80.58% |
1 |
$397 |
$42,134 |
73 |
|
|
119 |
|
$535 |
+34.76% |
1 |
$535 |
$41,001 |
80 |
|
|
128 |
|
$1,087 |
|
1 |
$1,087 |
$42,218 |
94 |
|
|
125 |
|
$717 |
|
1 |
$717 |
$43,521 |
108 |
|
|
109 |
|
$1,830 |
|
1 |
$1,830 |
$45,826 |
136 |
|
|
106 |
|
$2,006 |
+9.62% |
1 |
$2,006 |
$49,007 |
143 |
|
http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2001/0MNKY.html
I was unable to find
information on the Australian box office figures.
I
was only able to find two interviews with director Samantha Lang about ãThe
Monkeyâs Maskä. I was unable to
find any information on interviews with scriptwriter Anne Kennedy or the
producers- Robert Connolly and John Maynard.
David
Strattonâs interview with filmmaker (director) Samantha Lang on The Movie Show
Website about her film ãThe Monkeyâs Maskä:
http://www.sbs.com.au/movieshow/interviews.php3?id=44
Andrew L. Urbanâs
interview with filmmaker (director) Samantha Lang on the Urban Cinefile Website
about her film ãThe Monkeyâs Maskä:
http://www.urbancinefile.com.au/home/view.asp?a=4813&s=Interviews
Bibliographical details of reviews in newspapers,
critical essays in journals, discussions in books
I was unable to find any
hard-copied information on ãThe Monkeyâs Maskä at the Murdoch University Library. I also tried to do a number of
searches on the internet for information on The Monkeyâs Mask with
articles/reviews in newspapers, critical essays in journals and discussions but
I was unable to find anything. I think this was to do with the fact that it was
not a very popular film or a very successful film compared to other Australian
films or US blockbusters. It would be possible to find these things, but time
stopped me from finding them.
Details of the filmâs
on-line presence in the web literature.
There
was plenty of coverage on The Monkeyâs Mask on-line. I did searches through a
number of different search engines and it came up with a large list of
different websites. On most of them I typed in ãThe Monkeyâs Maskä or ãSamantha
Langä as well as ãAnne Kennedyä and some other names that I was unable to get
any results from. On the websites that I did find, these contained things such
as principal cast and credits, reviews and synopsises. Hereâs a list of
websites that I found with some coverage on Samantha Langâs ÎThe Monkeyâs
Maskâ:
http://www.monkeysmaskmovie.com/
Rotten
Tomatoes
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/TheMonkeysMask-1109846/reviews.php
Haro
Online
http://www.allmovie.com/cg/avg.dll
http://us.imdb.com/Title?0259442
http://www.urbancinefile.com.au/home/view.asp?Article_ID=3815
http://www.hollywood.com/movies/detail/movie/185303
http://www.upcomingmovies.com/monkeysmask.html
To
collect my information I used the internet. This film was only released in 2001
and this made it very difficult for me to find any information in film texts
and books. Searching for Samantha Langâs ãThe Monkeyâs Maskä on the internet was not a difficult task at all.
I used a number of search engines such as http://www.google.com,
http://www.yahoo.com.au, http://www.looksmartsearch.com. All
of which were very good in covering the many websites on The Monkeyâs Mask. I
found google.com to be particularly helpful as it seemed like there were a lot
more websites in this search engine. I also found a number of websites on the
Murdoch Library Website.
ÎThe
Monkeyâs Mask,â by director
Samantha Lang is the story taken
from Dorothy Porterâs verse
novel, which is also called, ÎThe Monkeyâs Maskâ. It is an Australian film noir.
Jill
Fitzpatrick (Susie Porter), a lesbian private investigator, is drawn to the
city, away from her mountainous country home to investigate the disappearance
of Mickey Norris (Abbie Cornish), a young poet who has recently gone missing.
During
her investigation, Jill manages to track down Diana (Kelly McGillis), Mickeyâs
poetry lecturer. Jill finds herself attracted to Diana and although Jill is
positive that Diana is hiding the truth from her it doesnât seem to stop her
from having an affair with this academic femme fatale.
Diana
is married to Nick (Marton Csokas) and he doesnât seem at all bothered by his
wifeâs affair with Jill. After investigating a number of senior poets with whom
Mickey was sexually involved with, Jill is still far from the truth. She is
blinded by her powerful passion for Diana and she is compromised in her search
for the truth, until her own life becomes endangered.
Jill
decides to question Nick, Dianaâs husband, and it is only then when the truth
finally comes out.
I
feel this film tells the usual investigation story from an interesting and
different perspective. This film is quite different to that of the usual private
investigation story, unlike a common detective story, the women tend to have
more power than the men. This film managed to keep me engrossed throughout the
entire film. It is a rather clichŽd film with the usual story of a former cop
turned private investigator, and has a clichŽd storyline but it still has
enough in it to keep the viewer switched on and engrossed. I wouldnât say itâs
the best film Iâve seen but then I wouldnât say it was the worst Iâve seen
either. I think, although predictable at the best of times, it was still a
quite enjoyable film.
This
is a film may have caused a bit of controversy when it was first released due
to the very visual sex scenes between Jill and Diana, which are shown on more
than one occasion. Most critics of this film said that the female sex scenes
were unnecessary in telling the story.
One
reviewer said, ãThe nudity is in the context of a lesbian affair that's about
as convincing as a Playboy photo shoot.ä
One
critic said that the best part of the film was the camera shots.
ãSpeaking
of cameras, Garry Phillips's cinematography is the one bright spot of the
movie. Using a blend of extreme close-ups set off center and stunning
widescreen shots, he creates a look that's much better than the material
deserves,ä he said.
I
think it wouldnât too be far from the truth for me to say that all of the
reviews I read about this film on the internet didnât really compliment this
film.
Susie
Porter was said by one critic to be a sex symbol.
ãAgain it's Porter and lots of sex. Sex
sex sex! Porter used to be the sideshow comic relief like in Two Hands or Amy.
Now, with Better Than Sex, Feeling Sexy and this film, she seems to have become
The Complete Sex Symbol,ä she said.
The
reviews that have been made from the time it was released until present date
have not really changed at all, they mostly talk about it being clichŽd,
containing too many unnecessary female sex scenes and not having much suspense
in it for a detective story.
THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF PRODUCTION AND RELEASE AND ITS BOX-OFFICE
The
circumstance of the production of ÎThe Monkeyâs Maskâ is that this film was based on Dorothy Porterâs
novel that is in verse. I believe this may have been a very hard task for
Scriptwriter Anne Kennedy to write it into a film. Maybe that is why this film
was not as successful as it could have been. The film seems rather cluttered
with different subplots, such as when different titles are placed upon the
screen. These headings are chapter titles that are in Dorothy Porterâs novel.
These headings are not really necessary in the film as they donât really take
us anywhere or make much of a point.
This
film was not at all a blockbuster but it made a US $49, 007 whereas Samantha
Langâs previous release of ÎThe Wellâ only made a mere US $9, 043. This is a
big difference between her two films.
In
1997 Samantha Lang released ÎThe Wellâ which was selected for a competition at
Cannes. This film also received 11 AFI (Australian Film Industry) nominations.
Samantha
Lang starts shooting LâIdol in Paris, France in July. ÎThe Monkeyâs Maskâ made
a higher US gross amount but ÎThe Wellâ shows to be a bit more successful in
Australia than ÎThe Monkeyâs Maskâ as it received nominations for AFI awards.
Cinematographer,
Garry Philipsâ prior work was ÎBetter Than Sexâ in 2000, which made a US gross
of $94, 940. This, by the amount of money it made, shows it to be a much more
successful film in the US than ÎThe Monkeyâs Maskâ.
Susie
Porter won an FCCA award for Best Supporting Actress in 19 for her role in ÎTwo
Handsâ in 1999. She also appeared in ÎParadise Roadâ and ÎWelcome to Woop
Woopâ. She played lead roles in ÎFeeling Sexyâ and ÎBetter Than Sexâ. She also
appears in ÎBootmenâ and her TV experience includes ÎWildsideâ, ÎWater Ratsâ
and ÎAftershocksâ. She is also going to star in the next Star Wars film ÎAttack
of the Clonesâ.
Kelly
McGillis previously starred in ÎTop Gunâ in 1989 which won the 1986 Best Original Song - Tom Whitlock, Giorgio
Moroder presented by: Academy Awards, 1986 Nominated Best Film Editing - Billy Weber presented by: Academy Awards,
1986 Nominated Best Sound presented by: Academy Awards
and 1986 Nominated Best Sound Effects Editing presented by: Academy Awards.
These awards prove that ÎThe Monkeyâs Maskâ was nowhere near as successful as
this other film that Kelly McGillis starred in.
One
of the producers of ÎThe Monkeyâs Maskâ, Robert Connolly is also a film
director of the 2001 film, ÎThe Bankâ. He won an AFI award for his achievement.
John
Maynard, another producer of ÎThe Monkeyâs Maskâ, has been a producer for 20
years. He co-produced Jane Campionâs ÎAn Angel at my Tableâ, which was the
winner of a ãSilver Lionä at the 1990 Venice Film Festival. In 1994 he produced
ÎAll Men Are Liarsâ, in 1997 ÎThe Boysâ and in 2001, ÎThe Bankâ which received
AFI awards.
The movie ÎThe Monkeyâs Maskâ, although not one of the best,
is an important film to Australia. It raises the points and ideas that women
are now taking on roles in Australian films that were once only filled by
males. It stands out in a significant way compared to that of other Australian
films. ÎThe Monkeyâs Maskâ could arguably be said to be a feminist film. This
film operates along the front that it, as said by Tom OâRegan,
ã..brings
into being a womanâs cinema: a cinema operating in and creating its own
alternative cultural space, such as that attempted by the Sydney Womenâs Film
Group from 1971, Reel Women in Melbourne from the mid01970s to early 1980s, and
Cinematrix in Perth in the 1980s and Beyond.ä (OâRegan, 1996).
This means that
ÎThe Monkeyâs Maskâ which was written by a female, directed by a female and the
lead roles that were played by females, allows women to achieve and maintain
some political and bureaucratic power. This may be done by many box-office US
movies but it is not such a common thing in Australia and this is why it is
such an important thing in making us see the general position of Australian
film and its values.
AUSTRALIAN
NATIONAL CINEMA AS A MEDIUM SIZED ENGLISH LANGUAGE CINEMA
In English
speaking countries, film industries only really cater for English Language
films. These countries such as Australia, United Kingdom, United States, Canada
and any other primary English speaking countries are only a small part of the
world, this enabling them to only be able to compete with the big budget
Hollywood films. This means that their films must be appealing to the American
film industry and audience, as that is where a lot of the money is for English
Language Cinema. It must also be something that is quite different at the same
time so it enables them to compete with the US market. It should be
ãantipodalä, enabling a negotiate path between Australian and US filmmaking.
ÎThe Monkeyâs
Maskâ by Samantha Lang is clearly an Australian film and is evident through the
landscapes that are represented throughout the film. The actual narrative could
enable it to be a Hollywood film, but if this film was a Hollywood film I doubt
it would be any more successful than it was with being Australian. This film
shows Australiaâs landscapes and by lead roles in this film being lesbians, it
gives a different perspective to Australian films.