THE RISE OF VIDEO IN THE PERTH
CONTEXT
James Mairata
The penetration of Video Cassette Recorders
(VCRs) in this country has been - to say the least
- phenomenal. Projected sales of VCRs within
Australia show that by the end of the year,
between 40% and 50% of Australian homes will
possess a video recorder, making Australia easily
the world leader in its acceptance of the video
machine. This statistic is especially interesting
when compared to that of the United States, where
it is estimated VCR penetration is at about only
18%. The availability of cable and satellite
television in the US is a likely reason for the
lessened impact of the video recorder there - the
kind of competition it does not have here in
Australia yet.
This paper gives an overview of the rise of the VCR
predominantly within a Perth context. It will
examine some areas which the VCR has affected
(cinema, broadcast television) and it will look at
the kind of technological infrastructure
(principally in the form of the video 'library') that
has developed out of video recorder technology.
Video recorders using the present VHS and Beta
cassettes first appeared on the Perth market in
about mid 1979. There had been other machines
before this. Philips had some time earlier
introduced a machine which took only a Philips
cassette while Sony had also made machines
using three quarter inch tape. These seem to have
been used in educational contexts and then
primarily for the time shifting of broadcast TV
viewing. The early VHS and Beta machines were
decidedly primitive in the features they offered
when compared to today's machines. These
machines used mechanical push down control
keys and most cassettes only ran for an hour.
Features like fast forward and reverse scanning,
frame by frame pausing, memory record
programming and remote control were simply
non-existent on these machines. Despite this, the
novelty of a new technology and the appearance
of film titles on video cassette made the machines
big sellers. So much so that retailers were not able
to meet the demand for some time. These
machines were also expensive. Prices began at
about $700.00 and increased in some cases to
double this as retailers took advantage of the great
demand by charging buyers inflated prices.
By contrast, video recorders complete with all of
the operating features mentioned now sell for
under $400.00. The continual updating of models
and improvements such as stereo video have
made video recorders even more appealing as a
purchase. Machine rental is also now well
organised making video technology more readily
accessible than ever before.
Cassettes, too, were in short supply during this
early period. The new longer 3-hour blank
cassettes were fetching between twenty and thirty
dollars at the time of their introduction. The
earliest manufacturers of VHS and Beta machines
were Sony, Sanyo, National and JVC (with JVC
manufacturing machines for other brands like
Akai, AWA and Thorn). There were a number of
other problems with these early models. Those,
for instance, who had bought the earlier Philips
machines now found they were unable to buy
cassettes as Philips had abandoned these
machines in favour of the VHS format. Problems
with television compatibility were also common
as only Philips video recorders, for example,
would play on Philips TV sets. It was possible to
buy an adaptor but Philips charged a modification
fee. In addition to this, many early video machines
werc compatible only with TV sets able to receive
a UHF signal. As Perth stations use only the VHF
band, TV sets sold here generally incorporated
only the ability to receive this band. Consumers
found that they either had to buy a television set
which could receive both frequencies, or buy a
video recorder which used VHF. As JVC and
National were able to introduce their VHS
machines before Sony produced their Beta
models, they were able to flood the Australian
market (and particularly in WA) with VHS models
giving them an early domination of the video
market. Sony were slow to introduce their
machines principally because they viewed the
Australian market as being of little potential and
their early estimates saw Australia as comprising
only 1% of Sony's world market. It seems that this
is the most likely explanation for Beta - in Perth
particularly - having only a 30% share of the video
market when compared to 40% and 50% shares
in other world markets.
The Emergence of the Video Library
By early 1981, the two video cassette formats -
VHS and Beta - were well established. To meet the
growing demand for film titles available on video
cassette, video libraries began to appear in Perth
suburbs. The existence of these libraries indicated
that video recorders were being used extensively
for film viewing. One of the first to set up an outlet
selling film titles on video was Bob Lassom. He
opened a library early in 1981 in Rivervale and
found that there was a strong demand for video
rentals. Conditions of rental were much stricter
than they are presently. Early libraries charged
joining fees and/or in some cases life
memberships, both of which were designed to
help cover the cost of the video shop's purchase
prices of new titles. Little government regulation
of the video libraries saw a number of marginal
and fly-by-night businesses set up, charge hefty
membership fees and then vanish altogether.
Concern by video shop owners at the extent of
these practices led a number to form the video
association of Western Australia in 1982. One
video shop owner involved with this association
is Michael Brock. He has served three terms as its
president and is now its secretary. According to
him, the most important functions of the
association lie with its consultative capacity with
the state government and its 'watchdog' function
with the police force in matters ranging from
legislation affecting the video industry to the
establishment of an industry which seeks to offer
a measure of professionalism and hence credibility
in its dealings with the public. The Association has
somewhere between 300 and 400 members
though the present size of the video library
industry in this state is not known because of the
number of delicatessens, petrol stations and
newsagencies which also rent video titles. In
addition to this, the picture is further complicated
by the knowledge that membership with the
association is not compulsory.
The Operation of Video Libraries
The growth of suburban video libraries in the past
four years is reminiscent of the suburban cinema
boom which occurred during the late 1920s and
30s. Virtually all video libraries in Perth are run
by the people who own them and in the vast
majority of cases this ownership is confined to a
single outlet. Video distributors do not themselves
control libraries in Perth, preferring instead to sell
titles to the suburban outlets. Until recently -
about the last twelve months - libraries would
charge a joining fee of something like $10.00
which entitled one to a life membership at that
library. On top of this, hiring of titles range in price
from between $2.00 and $4.00 each per night,
depending on whether the title is a new release or
not. Many libraries no longer charge a joining fee
because of the greater competition that a large
number of libraries now exerts upon the video
cassette hire market.
Another indication that video libraries may have
reached a saturation level is the number of
libraries which have closed recently. In the
metropolitan area alone in the last six months,
Intervideo have closed five outlets, Douglas Hi Fi
have closed a shop in Victoria Park, Video Atrium
have closed in Rivervale along with a number of
others. Whereas before there had been a steady
growth in the number of outlets, this trend
appears to have been reversed leaving the more
established libraries with large memberships to
cope with a stablilising demand. The
rationalisation now occurring within the industry
is further reflected in the small number of
supermarket-style libraries which are beginning
to appear. One such library is in East Victoria
Park. 'Video 3000' carries over 4000 titles and
displays them in a large showroom. This library
is the product of an amalgamation of a number of
small libraries from the eastern states and a great
part of its business is taken up with title
distribution and secondhand sales. The size of this
library can be gauged by the example of one
recent video release - The Killing Fields. Video
3000 stocked 21 copies of this title for hire (17
VHS, 4 Beta), where most libraries take perhaps
a total of 5 or 6 titles in both formats. On one
occasion that I visited this library - a Saturday
evening - every one of the 21 copies was out on
rental.
Rental Habits
Renting behaviour seems to be similar to cinema
viewing. Members of video libraries are interested
just come from cinema runs. Old titles, videos only
a few months old, even if past cinema successes,
rent infrequently. The rental life of a new video
release - if popular at the cinema - generally runs
at about 6 weeks (or approximately 60 runs), after
this, the rental frequency declines dramatically.
The attrition rate in terms of exhausted titles is
truly staggering. One wholesaler/distributor -
Hollywood Films - (50% owned by the Hoyts group
and based in Sydney) occasionally takes as many
as 500 traded-in titles from Perth video libraries
in one day. Hollywood films either sell these
'exhausted' titles directly to the public (from their
outlet in South Perth), or to the smaller video
libraries attached to delicat~ssens and service
stations. Fears that the Australian video market
would be used as a dumping ground by overseas
distributors seems justified. The shelves at
Hollywood Films have hundreds of obscure titles
which earn little rental revenue for video libraries
and serve only to drive up the costs of operating
a library. Films which do not gain a cinema run
and are instead released directly onto video also
- almost without exception - suffer from poor
rental. Distributors manage to off-load these titles
by offering them in a package with a proven
cinema release title. Both this aggressive
marketing by distributors and a revised system of
taxing have contributed towards rationalising the
numbers of video libraries operating.
The Rising Cost of Video Titles
Whilst the cost of blank tapes and video recorders
have been decreasing, the cost of video titles has
been steadily increasing. Bob Lassom recalls that
when he began his video library, titles could be
purchased for around $50.00, while the
'blockbuster' films were about $70.00. Titles now
cost around $100.00 and Lassom blames
excessive government taxing as the major reason
for the increase. As he points out, for every video
cassette there are taxes applied to the cover, the
labels, the cassette and the tape. To add to this,
the mini budget before the tax summit saw the
introduction of a tax on the royalties taken from
each video cassette which lifted the price of a video
title by approximately $10.00. Then there was the
redefining of the sales tax on videos so that the tax
is applied to the last point of the distribution chain
- the consignment agent - who then sells the title
to the video shop owner with the sales tax added.
This government move caused a shake up in
distribution. Distributors now sought to deal
direct with the video library owners. This
circumvented the necessity of further adding to
the sales tax calculations by removing the agents
from the distribution chain. Now, distributors like
Roadshow, Columbia-Hoyts and CEL all have
video offices in Perth.
The nett effect of these taxes has been to reduce
the number of new titles video libraries purchase.
This has reduced the range of titles that small
libraries in comparison to larger libraries can offer,
and has contributed to library closures. A recent
exception to the increasing prices of titles has been
the latest CEL releases which are selling to the
public at approximately $20.00. CEL have been
able to do this through high volume sales and
marketing. Their releases are available in
supermarkets and record shops - traditional areas
of high turnover. Michael Brock feels that CEL
may have misread the video title market. He
thinks that even at this low price people will rent
these same titles in preference to owning them.
Certainly this has so far been the case.
VCRs and Broadcast Television
There has been much discussion as to the way
VCRs have altered broadcast television viewing.
VCRs function as time shifting devices in regard
to television programs. People tend to record
programs which they would otherwise miss due
to other commitments or a desire to view
something on another channel. Commercial
television stations especially have been concerned
at the potential of the video recorder for avoiding
advertising, possible simply by fast forwarding a
recorded programme. In addition to this,
traditional rivalry between stations in
programming arrangements (e.g. the Sunday
night movie) may need to be reorganised in light
of the possibility of watching one program on one
channel while recording the rival program on the
other channel. So, too, the traditional effectiveness
of a 'blockbuster' movie in capturing ratings is
now lessened by the knowledge that the title to be
screened has probably long been available at the
nearest video library. However, the debate over
how the video recorder has altered broadcast
television viewing seems only minor when
compared to that which has taken place
concerning the video recorder's influence on the
cinema.
Video Recorders and the Cinema
Some say that video will spell the end of the
cinema. The reality is not quite so drastic. The WA
manager of Hoyts' theatres, Max Reddin, sees
video exerting less influence upon the cinema
than it did a year ago. He pinpoints February 1984
as the point at which video did markedly affect
national cinema attendances. Through his contact
with the management of 'Ace' and 'City' theatres,
Reddin established that overall cinema
attendances in Perth had fallen by about 40% (this
reflected the national figure). Since then, cinema
companies have attempted to arrest this decline
by doing a number of surveys aimed at
pinpointing why people were no longer attending
cinema sessions. Although these surveys revealed
a number of problem areas - like the price of a
movie ticket and the preference of screenings
without shorts - video was seen as the most
influential culprit. In an effort to bring people back
to the cinema, Hoyts successfully introduced half-
price sessions on Tuesdays. Hoyts have found,
however, that this move has attracted a different
audience to that of the regular cinemagoer.
According to Max Reddin, 80% of regular cinema
audiences are under the age of 25 and an
interesting link with video lies in the behaviour
of the audience during screenings. Reddin has
noticed that cinemagoers are much noisier during
screenings than they used to be. This leads him
to speculate that audiences now duplicate their
video watching habits in the cinema.
Just as the cinema survived radio and television,
it is recovering from video. In May of this year,
Hoyts noticed that cinema attendances were again
increasing. By August of this year, attendance
figures are now only down 20% on the same
periods before the decline. Cinema groups believe
that this recovery is a long term one. Indeed, a
number of new multi-million dollar cinema
complexes are being constructed in the eastern
states. Hoyts will open a multi cinema complex
in Surfers Paradise this November while Greater
Union are building a complex in Sydney and the
Village group are also building a complex in
Melbourne.
One interesting theory about the recovery of the
cinema's popularity is that video's has decreased
somewhat. Certainly much of the worthwhile
video releases have been exhausted - video has
lost its novelty value and now people are returning
to the cinema to reappreciate the obvious
advantages of a large screen and lively
atmosphere. Nevertheless, cinema has not
entirely recovered from the impact of video. Video
seems to have well and truly killed the drive-in
theatre as only a handful survive in the
metropolitan area, and almost none in country
areas. Nor have the cinema groups ignored video.
Hoyts, for instance, realising its potential as a
profitable industry, have become involved in its
distribution. As Reddin points out, video
distribution involves less financial risk than a
cinema release. Simultaneous release of a 35mm
print in a large number of cinemas is very
expensive at the level of paying for the prints and
in publicity costs as opposed to the copying of a
master video tape which is very much cheaper.
VCRs and the Future
Video cassette recorders are suffering from rapid
technological obsolescence as advances in
technology are constantly making previous
models redundant. If stereo video is the most
recent of these changes, 8mm video appears to be
the next major change. Rod Benness of Gibson-
Benness - the state distributor of Sony Video 8 -
believes that video 8 will eventually replace the
current l/2 inch video formats within the next
three years. He points to its superior picture
quality and its 6-track audio facility - all on a tiny
metal tape - as its selling points. As well as this,
cassette size has been standardised this time,
avoiding the problem of multiple l/2 inch cassette
systems. According to Benness, demand for the
Video 8 cameras has already outstripped supply
(and a separate Video 8 VCR will be available after
Christmas). Knowledge that a number of large
manufacturers have taken up the Video 8
technology - including the giant Kodak company
- raises the question of whether the days of 1/2 inch
video are almost over. It begs the question: How
will the vast number of video libraries and
consumers cope with a change in cassette format?
For their help in preparing this article I would like
to thank Max Reddin of Hoyts, Michael Brock of
the WA Video Association, Rod Benness of Gibson-
Benness, Don Moran and Bob Lassom. Although
all are busypeople, they willingly made their time
available for interviews. The views expressed,
however, are my own.