"Form is Heceforth divorced from matter."

Holmes' "divorce of form from matter" is not, primarily a stereoscopic function, it is a possible consequence of photography. Stereography, with its additional third dimension enhances the reality aspect of form. Once form is rendered in a pure state, uncontaminated by matter, it becomes theoretically possible to inscribe it with meanings that are not attributable to the object in reality. This is the basis of Jean Baudrillard's concept of post modernity, in which the circulation of simulacra becomes a currency in and of itself. Homes appears, at times to veer towards this position but, unlike Baudrillard, he regards this as a liberating moment. Once the viewer has made a selection from the vast field of photographic detail, he is able to fill the contigent form with ideas, narratives and connections, like that of Holmes' speculation on the circumstances of James Russel in the Aloway Kirk Scenario.

But there is another feature that prevents the imaginary production, now concretised by form from, from becoming a meer figment of the spectator's imagination. On the one hand there is the romantic production, while on the other there is the guarenteed photographic evidence that the object of the romance is real. They slide into a single whole like the two different sides of a stereograph drift together to finally present a total reality. It is an image of the specator's making stamped with the seal of truth. It is a small part of the image envisioned by the text, but its substance (matter) has changed. It is no longer 'about' what the general view tried to say.

In a second piece of futuristic thinking, Holmes envisages a vast network of Image library's the archives of which are available to the public. Image libraries, providing 'library footage,' exist today but they are largely controlled by the institutions of photojournalism, advertising or television. The images are constituted by appratus more like that of the diorama than of the stereoscope.

holmes-com2.GIF (21024 bytes)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anticipating John Hartley's theories on the comminity binding aspects of the media by*** years, Holmes wants the steroscope to provide a community binding function

 

 

 

They are two dimensional rather than stereoscopic, and we must move to the photography section of this site to see if the two photographic formats are compatible.

 

  This begs the question, "what viewing freedoms do the optical apparatus and texts of the late-twentieth century, and forthcoming millennium, allow their viewers?"

(10)

+++++++++++++
Photography