|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DEVELOPING STANDARDS, ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING PRACTICES Screen Productions require a range of intertwined tasks as indicated schematically in Figure A. These tasks are: “Topic” specific (1) “Media” specific (2) and “Design” specific (3). In addition, each task has to be integrated with the other two, namely: the “Topic” has to be integrated with the “Media” (4) and the “Media” has to be integrated with the narrative “Design” (5). The final screen production is the gestalt integration of all of these tasks (6).
![]() The above figure indicates schematically how setting standards, assessment and reporting practices for screen producers is at least six times as complex as that required for conventional (“Topic” specific) academic task - designated by 1 above. ASPERA also accepts that there are at least eight authors contributing to screen production. 4 These are: Topic Researcher, Writer, Director, Creative Producer, Camera-person, Editor, Special Effects Designer & Staff/Executive Producer.
The first project conference at VCA, in July 2008, will resolve how standards, assessment and reporting practices should be set.
CONFERENCES
MEDIA ARTS CONGRESS
For more information please visit the links below: Vital Signs: Revisited Imaging Futures Diegetic Life Forms and Diegetic Logic: Assessing Image-based Scholarship |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Support for this project website has been provided by Australian Learning & Teaching Council, an
initiative of the Australian Government Department of Education, Science and Training. The views
expressed in the project do not necessarily reflect the views of the Australian Learning & Teaching
Council. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Australia License. |